The case of Hammond v INTC Network Services Ltd [2007], the problems in front of agents, if the complainant alleged that the defendant’s conduct caused him to suffer from clinical depression. The applicant in this case was employed by the defendant until he was finally released.
The applicant was from a clinical depression that had caused primarily by the conduct of the defendant, its employees or representatives of suffering. He claimed that there is negligence or harassment was contrary to the law on the protection from harassment in 1997 (the “Act”).
The plaintiff made a series of allegations about the conduct of employers, he said amounted to harassment. The conduct in question, including the fact that he was moved to another part of a project for a week.
In response to defendant’s argument on contemporary documents, the applicant claimed that the documents are either forged or altered.
The court, applying the principles decided that their behavior may be an element of real seriousness must constitute harassment under the law. The behavior must be regarded as oppressive and unacceptable. If the interpretation of the law means that employers with allegations of harassment every time they made a business decision faced the economy would be paralyzed.
» Read more: Employment Law – Vicarious Liability – Harassment – Depression